
Locofy vs Anima: Check Export Targets, Code, and Plans
Check Locofy and Anima export targets, code quality, responsiveness, and current vendor plans using your own screen.
This is an evaluation guide, not a ranked list or a hands-on benchmark. Use the checks below on your own screen and verify vendor settings and plans.
TL;DR
- Both tools export React/HTML, but their workflow focus, collaboration, and output control differ.
- Related comparison guides.
What this comparison covers
This guide focuses on export targets, workflow fit, and code quality checkpoints. It avoids marketing promises and prioritizes what matters in production.
Strengths to evaluate (high level)
- Locofy: React, Next.js, HTML/CSS, Vue, Angular. Locofy documentation.
- Anima: React, Vue, HTML. Anima documentation.
If you want a broader shortlist, use the Figma to Code Converter hub.
Feature comparison framework
Use this checklist to compare both tools objectively:
| Area | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Export targets | React, Next.js, HTML/CSS, Tailwind support |
| Componentization | Props, variants, reusable components |
| Layout fidelity | Auto layout, grid/flex output, breakpoints |
| Design tokens | Colors, spacing, typography mapping |
| Collaboration | Comments, handoff specs, team permissions |
| Code ownership | Source export, editability after export |
Code quality checklist
- Semantic HTML (headings, lists, buttons).
- Clean JSX structure without over-nesting.
- Minimal absolute positioning for layout.
- Consistent class naming or Tailwind utilities.
- Predictable responsiveness across breakpoints.
Pricing comparison: what to check
Pricing changes quickly, so focus on:
- Free export limits and watermark rules.
- Seat-based vs project-based billing.
- Team collaboration features by plan.
- Commercial usage rights for exported code.
Check current vendor plans directly; CloneWebsite pricing describes only the CloneWebsite extension. Locofy · Anima.
How to decide in 5 steps
- Pick your target output (React, Next.js, HTML, Tailwind).
- Export one real screen from your design system.
- Review code quality using the checklist above.
- Check collaboration needs and plan constraints.
- Validate responsiveness with real content.
FAQ
Is one tool always better for React?
Not always. Run a real export with your own components to compare output quality.
Can I keep editing the code after export?
Yes, but prioritize tools that export clean structure and minimal inline styles.
What if I only need a landing page?
A simpler HTML export may be enough. Compare options on the comparison page.
Recommendation
Evaluate code structure, supported outputs, responsiveness, and plan limits with the same representative screen. Record your own results rather than relying on an unsupported score.
Next steps
- Compare more tools on the design to code tools comparison.
- Explore workflow guidance in the Figma to Code hub.
Official resources
More Posts

Figma Auto Layout to CSS Grid: A Practical Guide
How to convert auto layout to responsive CSS Grid and Tailwind.


What Does It Mean to Clone a Website?
Clone website meaning explained — what cloning a web page actually copies, why people do it, the legal line, and how to clone a page locally.


Figma to Code Tools: Evaluate Exports, Frameworks, and Cost
Evaluate Figma-to-code exports, design tokens, responsive layout, code ownership, and vendor plans using a real project.

Newsletter
Join the community
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates